A reflection on patience, presence, and life’s unexpected gifts.

I currently live in a major metropolitan area—Columbus, Ohio. Well, technically Commercial Point, but the distinction is small. I grew up in West Virginia, a state tucked entirely within the Appalachian Mountains. There’s no truly flat land there—at least not a continuous square mile. The landscape is thick with forest and laced with creeks. It was easy to lose yourself in the trees or feel like you’d stepped into another world.

You might think that kind of escape would be hard to find around Columbus. Surprisingly, it isn’t. A quick glance at a map shows rivers—the Olentangy and the Scioto—and countless creeks. While some flow through urban areas, others offer pockets of isolation, just a few hundred yards from roads and neighborhoods.

My favorite is the Big Walnut Creek. I know it well, both upstream and downstream from its confluence in Three Creeks Metro Park. Sometimes I fish right at the confluence, though it can get noisier than I like. There’s something indescribably calming about stepping into its cool waters. You feel the temperature through your waders, and the gentle current presses against you just enough to remind you it’s alive.

Then come the signs of life: minnows darting, birds diving toward the surface, a snake gliding past, or a beaver slapping the water with its tail to announce your presence. In these moments, I’m reminded of Psalm 23:2–3: “He leads me beside still waters. He restores my soul.” The creek is a stillness that restores.

Over the years, I’ve collected rods and reels for every scenario—short ones for tight spots among trees, long ones for open stretches of water. But no matter the gear, the best part of fishing the Big Walnut—especially near its confluence—is the unpredictability. You never truly know what you’ve hooked until it’s nearly landed. Sometimes your line snaps. Sometimes the fish throws the lure. Your heart races, and your mind reminds you to stay patient.

One morning, just twenty or thirty yards downstream from the confluence, the creek reminded me why I love it so much. My first hole came up empty. My next cast—a clumsy flick near a downed tree—was hardly promising. Then the water swirled. Something had taken the bait. The fight began.

The power was incredible. I loosened the drag, but the fish pulled hard enough to slide my boots in the mud. When it finally broke the surface, I could hardly believe my eyes: a muskie, thirty-six inches long, flat-faced, bright-eyed, and fierce. I somehow got it over the bank—just barely—and snapped a photo for my son. He didn’t believe me until he saw it.

That single encounter—the “fish of 10,000 casts”—taught me a larger lesson. Life is unpredictable. Some of the best things come when we aren’t even trying. Some battles are hard, and the outcome uncertain—but God’s presence in the quiet moments carries us through. “Be still before the Lord and wait patiently for Him” (Psalm 37:7).

Over the years, I’ve caught all kinds of fish in these waters—smallmouth bass, saugeye, wiper, gar, rock bass. Each fight is different. Each teaches patience, observation, and respect. But the real value is in the quiet moments: standing in the water at dawn, feeling the current, watching the fog lift from the creek, noticing the small details of life. These are moments for reflection, prayer, and gratitude.

Fishing, like life, requires presence. It reminds us to notice beauty, embrace patience, and celebrate the unexpected gifts along the way. We plan, we cast, we hope—and sometimes, God surprises us with a muskie, a moment of clarity, or a quiet pause that restores our soul.

I’ve found that these moments on the creek are also opportunities for gratitude. Life is good. You just have to notice it.

A personal reflection on stillness, nature, and the moments that teach us hope.

There’s something healing about nature. Many times I’ve needed quiet, and a forest or a mountain is always waiting—silent, patient, forgiving. A friend. Never judging, never telling me what to do, never rushing me.

Nature’s silence isn’t empty. It listens. It witnesses. It absorbs the anguish you pour out. It’s a perfect altar for prayer. A perfect escape from a world that sometimes dismisses your pain.

The trees don’t rush; when the wind blows through them, they whisper truth. The rocks don’t panic; they support. The water beside you doesn’t ask for explanations—it simply soothes. “Be still, and know that I am God” (Psalm 46:10).

I have known severe tragedy. I had a son named Chance, but he was not meant to stay long in this world. We held him for five hours before he took his last breath. Both before his birth and after, I sought solitude—in the woods, on a mountain, by the water.

There’s a spot I call “Church Rock,” overlooking a southern high plain of Appalachia. From there, I see ridges stretching into the distance, scattered with boulders split long ago. Early in the morning, fog clings to the top. The mountain feels almost yours, even for a short while.

If you follow the gravel trail atop Spruce Mountain, you can climb a small tower and gaze out over what feels like the whole world. The stillness holds as the fog lingers. Only with patience does the Earth begin to reveal its secrets.

I’ve read scripture here. I am a Christian, but that’s not required to find healing in these moments. Maybe the mountain isn’t your place—but there is always a space to hear the still, small voice of God, however you understand it. “My presence will go with you, and I will give you rest” (Exodus 33:14).

Sometimes, just sitting and being is enough. Sitting and breathing. Sitting and listening. Even in silence, you hear a lot.

---

In 2009, before Chance was born, I sat on the observation tower. The fog hung low, forcing focus on what I could see—only the small world on that tower. I realized there was fog in my mind, too. Only the Son could clear it.

I opened my Bible, not looking for anything in particular. I landed on Romans 10:11: “Anyone who believes in Him will never be put to shame.” In my mind, I read it this way: “Those who call on the Lord will not be put to shame.”

The doctors had told us to give up hope. Chance had Potter Syndrome—no kidneys. They were right medically. But we were right spiritually and emotionally: he lived. For five hours. Three hundred minutes. Eighteen thousand seconds.

Those moments taught me something essential: the world moves fast, but life—real life—often happens in quiet, still seconds.

---

I’ve shared Church Rock with others. To many, it’s just a rock, just a hill, just a view. Stand still, or you’ll miss it. You can see the Fingerprints—the handiwork of God in the trees, the wind, the rocks, the sky.

Spruce Knob is special to me, but it’s not the place itself—it’s the pause it gives me. We all have places where we remember, wrestle, breathe, and meet God. Find yours. Be still. Breathe. Listen. Even in silence, you’ll hear more than you expect.

Years ago, when I dabbled in songwriting, I wrote a line that’s stuck with me:
“I’ll bet it’s a funny feeling when a young’n calls you ‘Daddy,’ and that’s something I can’t wait to hear.”

I came up with that line soon after my wife and I learned we were expecting our first child. I was 22. She was 20. And like most young parents, I was full of questions: Am I ready for this? Can we afford it? What if I mess it all up?

Looking back, I wasn’t ready—not emotionally, at least. I was selfish, immature, and didn’t understand what being a Dad really meant. In those early years, my boys often chose to be around their Mom. I can’t blame them. I could be impatient, maybe even a little mean.

But I’ve learned something over the years: fatherhood is biology. Daddy is relationship.

---

Being a father is easy—any man can do it. But being Daddy? That takes presence, patience, and love. Scripture calls us to it: “Fathers, do not provoke your children to anger, but bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord” (Ephesians 6:4). That’s not a suggestion—it’s a calling.

Do I want my kids to be little versions of me? Maybe a little. But mostly, I want them to be good men, carrying forward the best of me, their mother, their grandparents, and others who’ve shaped them—and leaving my mistakes behind. “Train up a child in the way he should go; even when he is old he will not depart from it” (Proverbs 22:6).

I wasn’t a “trophy dad.” I never forced my boys to relive my glory days or chase my dreams. If one wanted to be a bodybuilder and another a ballerina, I was their biggest fan, either way. I became a Band Dad—cheering from the sidelines, celebrating their victories, helping them fail well, and watching them grow.

There are lessons I wanted them to learn beyond sports or grades: honesty, kindness, empathy, patience. “Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap” (Galatians 6:7). Life is full of consequences, and teaching them to live rightly, with integrity, became my mission.

I wanted my children to come to me when things were hard—not hide. To know that Daddy is a safe place. Proverbs reminds us, “The Lord detests lying lips, but he delights in people who are trustworthy” (Proverbs 12:22). This principle guided me as I modeled honesty and consistency.

Being Daddy also means showing love without conditions. My Pappaw would say, “People is people.” I taught my children the same: love and respect others, no matter their skin, background, or beliefs. Scripture is clear: “If anyone says, ‘I love God,’ and hates his brother, he is a liar” (1 John 4:20).

And above all, love God. Teach them to love God, too. “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might. And these words… shall be on your heart. You shall teach them diligently to your children” (Deuteronomy 6:5-7). Fatherhood isn’t just about guiding behavior—it’s about shaping souls.

Be present. Be steady. “So teach us to number our days that we may get a heart of wisdom” (Psalm 90:12). Life moves fast, and these moments won’t come again. Daddy shows up. He listens, comforts, instructs, and celebrates. He is both shield and cheerleader.

Being a Dad means watching your kids grow—physically, emotionally, spiritually—and most importantly, independently. It’s the feeling of knowing, “Maybe I actually did something right.”

---

Conclusion

Anyone can father a child. But it takes intentionality, love, and the Spirit’s guidance to be a Daddy. When we choose presence over absence, patience over anger, and truth over pride, we reflect the heart of our Heavenly Father. “See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God!” (1 John 3:1).

Fathers may create life. Daddies shape it. Choose to be Daddy.

The First Chapter

Now that we’ve established the genre of Revelation as an apocalyptic work and outlined principles for interpreting its symbolic language, it’s time to engage the text directly. This post delves into the entirety of Revelation 1, broken into manageable sections to avoid overwhelming detail. Prepare for an extensive exploration—buckle in.

I advocate a blended approach: inductive study, where the reader interrogates the text through observation, interpretation, and application, paired with a historical-contextual method. The latter poses critical questions:

• Who were the key figures, and what motivated them?
• What political, social, or religious pressures shaped their world?
• How did the author’s context—Roman domination, persecution, temple dynamics—influence the writing?

This matters because we are not the original audience, and Scripture emerged within specific historical milieus. Contextual understanding unlocks nuances otherwise obscured. With this framework, let’s begin.

Revelation 1:1-8

Prologue

1 The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his servants the things that must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John, 2 who bore witness to the word of God and to the testimony of Jesus Christ, even to all that he saw. 3 Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear, and who keep what is written in it, for the time is near.

Greeting to the Seven Churches

4 John to the seven churches that are in Asia: Grace to you and peace from him who is and who was and who is to come, and from the seven spirits who are before his throne, 5 and from Jesus Christ the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of kings on earth. 6 To him who loves us and has freed us from our sins by his blood and made us a kingdom, priests to his God and Father, to him be glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen. 7 Behold, he is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him, even those who pierced him, and all tribes of the earth will wail on account of him. Even so. Amen. 8 “I am the Alpha and the Omega,” says the Lord God, “who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.”

Initial Observations

Who is John? Tradition identifies him as the Apostle John, the “disciple whom Jesus loved” (John 13:23), but evidence remains inconclusive. Early church fathers like Irenaeus (c. 180 CE) support this, yet textual ambiguity and the lack of explicit self-identification as the Gospel’s author suggest caution. This merits further exploration with historical notes.

John’s blessing—“Blessed is the one who reads aloud… and those who hear, and who keep”—hints at Revelation’s function as a circular letter. The Greek makarios (μακάριος, blessed; BDAG 2000, s.v. “μακάριος”) and anaginōskō (ἀναγινώσκω, to read aloud; Revelation 1:3) imply a liturgical setting, with phylassō (φυλάσσω, to keep or obey) emphasizing active response. This opening serves as a generic yet purposeful introduction.

“The Time Is Near”

The phrase “for the time is near” (ho kairos engys, ὁ καιρὸς ἐγγύς) resists precise chronology. Kairos denotes a qualitative moment, not a chronological chronos (χρόνος), and engys (near) is subjective—five years may feel distant to some, imminent to others. Jesus’ caveat in Matthew 24:36 (“But concerning that day and hour no one knows… but the Father”) reinforces this ambiguity, describing signs like “wars and rumors of wars” (Matthew 24:6) as ōdin (ὠδίν, birth pangs; Matthew 24:8), not exact timelines.

Christ’s ascension (Acts 1:9–11) might mark the end times’ onset, with the Spirit’s descent (Acts 2:1–4) initiating this era, culminating in His return. Since then, conflict has persisted—humanity’s hamartia (ἁμαρτία, sinfulness) ensures it. As of August 22, 2025, ongoing wars include the Russo-Ukrainian War, Gaza War, Sudanese Civil War, Rwanda conflict, Amhara war, and Cambodia-Thailand border dispute. The Uppsala Conflict Data Program (2024) reports 61 state-based conflicts, 11 at war intensity, while the Geneva Academy tracks over 110 armed clashes globally. The U.S., engaged since Vietnam in Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Somalia, exemplifies this continuity. These are ōdin, not a specific date—birth pangs signal labor’s start, not its conclusion.

Date-setting has faltered historically. Tim LaHaye’s Are We Living in the End Times? ties World War I to these signs, but its global scope was incomplete. William Miller’s 1843–1844 predictions, culminating in the October 22, 1844, “Great Disappointment,” birthed the Millerites and influenced Adventism. Charles Taze Russell’s 1914 forecast shaped Jehovah’s Witnesses. Each failed because God transcends human chronoi (plural of chronos).

Christological Titles

John’s greeting employs rich titles for Christ: “who is and who was and who is to come” (ho ōn kai ho ēn kai ho erchomenos, ὁ ὢν καὶ ὁ ἦν καὶ ὁ ἐρχόμενος), “firstborn of the dead” (prōtotokos tōn nekrōn, πρωτότοκος τῶν νεκρῶν), and “ruler of kings on earth” (archōn tōn basileōn tēs gēs, ἄρχων τῶν βασιλέων τῆς γῆς). The first echoes God’s self-revelation (ehyeh asher ehyeh, אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה; Exodus 3:14), affirming eternality. Prōtotokos signifies primacy in resurrection (Colossians 1:18), challenging death’s dominion. Archōn defies Roman emperors’ divine claims, asserting Christ’s exousia (ἐξουσία, authority).

Verse 7’s “coming with the clouds” (erchomenos meta tōn nephelōn, ἐρχόμενος μετὰ τῶν νεφελῶν) alludes to Daniel 7:13 (bar enash, בַּר אֱנָשׁ, Son of Man), with panta phylē tēs gēs (πάντα φυλὴ τῆς γῆς, all tribes) wailing in koptō (κόπτω, lamentation). Verse 8’s “Alpha and Omega” (Alpha kai Omega) and “Almighty” (pantokratōr, παντοκράτωρ) declare divine supremacy over all aiones (αἰῶνες, ages).

The “seven spirits” (ta hepta pneumata, τὰ ἑπτὰ πνεύματα) before the throne likely symbolize the Spirit’s fullness (cf. Zechariah 4:2, 10; Isaiah 11:2), with hepta (ἑπτά) denoting completeness.

Revelation 1:9-20

9 I, John, your brother and partner in the tribulation and the kingdom and the patient endurance that are in Jesus, was on the island called Patmos on account of the word of God and the testimony of Jesus. 10 I was in the Spirit on the Lord’s day, and I heard behind me a loud voice like a trumpet 11 saying, “Write what you see in a book and send it to the seven churches, to Ephesus and to Smyrna and to Pergamum and to Thyatira and to Sardis and to Philadelphia and to Laodicea.” 12 Then I turned to see the voice that was speaking to me, and in turning I saw seven golden lampstands, 13 and in the midst of the lampstands one like a son of man, clothed with a long robe, with a golden sash around his chest. 14 The hairs of his head were white, like white wool, like snow. His eyes were like a flame of fire, 15 his feet were like burnished bronze, refined in a furnace, and his voice was like the roar of many waters. 16 In his right hand he held seven stars; from his mouth came a sharp two-edged sword, and his face was like the sun shining in full strength. 17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. But he laid his right hand on me, saying, “Fear not, I am the first and the last, 18 and the living one. I died, and behold I am alive forevermore, and I have the keys of Death and Hades. 19 Write therefore the things that you have seen, those that are and those that are to take place after this. 20 As for the mystery of the seven stars that you saw in my right hand, and the seven golden lampstands, the seven stars are the angels of the seven churches, and the seven lampstands are the seven churches.

Contextual Setting

John, a “brother and partner” (adelphos kai synkoinōnos, ἀδελφὸς καὶ συγκοινωνός) in thlipsis (θλῖψις, tribulation), basileia (βασιλεία, kingdom), and hypomonē (ὑπομονή, endurance), was exiled to Patmos under Domitian (c. 81–96 CE) for his martys (μάρτυς, witness; Revelation 1:9). The “Lord’s day” (kyriakē hēmera, κυριακῇ ἡμέρᾳ) suggests a worship context, with a voice hōs salpigx (ὡς σάλπιγξ, like a trumpet) commanding grapson (γράψον, write; Revelation 1:11).

Vision of Christ

Turning, John sees seven lychniai chrysai (λυχνίαι χρυσᾶι, golden lampstands) and a homoios huios anthrōpou (ὅμοιος υἱὸς ἀνθρώπου, one like a Son of Man), evoking Daniel 7:13. The poderēs (ποδηρής, long robe) and zōnē chryse (ζώνη χρυσῆ, golden sash) signify priestly and kingly roles (Exodus 28:4; 1 Kings 10:5). White hair (thrix leukai, θρίξ λευκαί) like wool or snow reflects holoklēros (ὁλόκληρος, holiness) and sophia (σοφία, wisdom) of Daniel’s ‘atiq yomin (עַתִּיק יֹמִין, Ancient of Days; Daniel 7:9). Eyes hōs phlox pyros (ὡς φλὸξ πυρός, like a flame) denote penetrating judgment (Daniel 10:6), feet hōs chalkolibanon (ὡς χαλκολίβανον, burnished bronze) symbolizing refined strength (Ezekiel 1:7), and a voice hōs phōnē hydatōn pollōn (ὡς φωνὴ ὑδάτων πολλῶν, like many waters) echoing divine power (Ezekiel 43:2).

The hepta asteres (ἑπτὰ ἀστέρες, seven stars) and rhomphaia distomos (ῥομφαία δίστομος, two-edged sword) from His mouth signify authority and judgment (Hebrews 4:12), while His face hōs ho hēlios (ὡς ὁ ἥλιος, like the sun) radiates doxa (δόξα, glory; Revelation 1:16). Falling hōs nekros (ὡς νεκρός, as dead), John receives reassurance: “Fear not” (mē phobou, μὴ φοβοῦ), with Christ as prōtos kai eschatos (πρῶτος καὶ ἔσχατος, first and last), zōn (ζῶν, living), holding kleis (κλεὶς, keys) of thanatos kai hadēs (θάνατος καὶ ᾅδης, Death and Hades; Revelation 1:17–18).

Interpretation

This vision, rooted in apokalypsis (ἀποκάλυψις, revelation), positions Christ amid His ekklēsiai (ἐκκλησίαι, churches) as archiereus (ἀρχιερεύς, high priest) and basileus (βασιλεύς, king), wielding exousia over life and death. The mystērion (μυστήριον, mystery) of stars as angeloi (ἄγγελοι, angels) and lampstands as churches (Revelation 1:20) underscores divine oversight.

Conclusion

Revelation 1 establishes Christ’s eternal authority and presence with His churches, urging obedience amid tribulation. Historical context—Roman persecution, imperial cult—shapes its urgency. Next week, we’ll explore chapters 2–3.

Introduction

Contemporary Christian rhetoric frequently elevates the United States to a divinely favored status, invoking phrases such as “God bless America” or asserting its role as the spiritual successor to Israel. This fusion of patriotism with theological claims misaligns with scriptural intent, prioritizing national pride over divine fidelity. N.T. Wright cautions, “The biblical covenantal narrative is anchored in Israel, not a proxy nation, resisting any attempt to usurp its divine promises” (Wright 2013, 152). This extended analysis examines the specificity of God’s covenant with Israel through detailed Hebrew and Greek exegesis, the absence of prophetic legitimacy for the U.S., the hazards of spiritual pride, the theological distortions of Christian Nationalism, and the preeminence of kingdom allegiance. It draws upon historical theology and insights from Walter Brueggemann, Richard Bauckham, Walter Kaiser, John Stott, and additional scholars to provide a robust scholarly foundation.

Covenant Is Specific, Not Transferable

The divine covenant with Abraham and Israel is explicitly particular, rooted in a chosen lineage. Genesis 12:1–3 (ESV) declares, “I will make of you a great nation… I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.” The Hebrew berakah (ברָכָה, blessing) encompasses material prosperity, divine protection, and a redemptive mission to all nations (BDB 1906, s.v. “ברך”). Genesis 17:7–8 (ESV) reinforces this: “I will establish my covenant between me and you and your offspring… for an everlasting covenant… the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession.” The term ‘ôlām (עוֹלָם, everlasting) signifies a perpetual relationship tied to Abraham’s seed, contingent upon covenantal fidelity (BDB 1906, s.v. “עולם”).

Paul affirms this continuity in Romans 11:29 (ESV): “The gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.” The Greek ametamelēta (ἀμεταμέλητα, irrevocable) underscores God’s unchanging faithfulness (pistos theos, πιστὸς θεός; BDAG 2000, s.v. “ἀμεταμέλητος”), with Gentiles grafted into Israel’s olive tree (elaia, ἐλαία; Romans 11:17–18), sharing its rhiza (ῥίζα, root) without supplanting it (Wright 2013, 148). Walter Brueggemann asserts, “The covenant’s specificity to Israel, marked by berit (בְּרִית, covenant), precludes its appropriation by other nations” (Brueggemann 2001, 32). The U.S., despite its Christian heritage or moral aspirations, lacks the genealogical and covenantal lineage established through zera‘ (זֶרַע, seed; Genesis 17:7), rendering claims of inherited promises untenable. Historical theologian R. Kendall Soulen adds, “The covenant’s irrevocability does not extend to nations outside Israel’s mishpachah (מִשְׁפָּחָה, family)” (Soulen 1996, 45).

America Is Not a Prophetic Actor

Biblical covenants are relational, spiritual, and ethically binding, transcending mere political or geographical constructs. Israel’s promises—land (eretz, אֶרֶץ), nationhood (goy, גּוֹי), and blessing (berakah)—were contingent upon obedience (shama‘, שָׁמַע, to hear and obey; Deuteronomy 28:1), justice (mishpat, מִשְׁפָּט; Micah 6:8), and faithfulness (emunah, אֱמוּנָה; Habakkuk 2:4). Walter Kaiser notes, “Covenantal promises are intrinsically linked to Israel’s historical and ethical torah (תּוֹרָה, instruction), not transferable to modern states” (Kaiser 1995, 115). The U.S., founded in 1776, lacks this prophetic continuity, its identity shaped by secular governance and cultural pluralism rather than divine mandate.

Revelation further delineates Israel’s unique role. Richard Bauckham writes, “Revelation situates Israel at the center of God’s redemptive oikonomia (οἰκονομία, plan; Ephesians 1:10), while other nations face krisis (κρίσις, judgment) or inclusion through metanoia (μετάνοια, repentance; Bauckham 1993, 91).” The U.S. aligns with Babylon (Revelation 17–18), critiqued for hybris (ὕβρις, pride) and dynamis (δύναμις, power), rather than Israel’s covenantal mission. Craig Keener supports this, noting, “The U.S.’s historical narrative lacks the diatheke (διαθήκη, covenant) that defines Israel’s prophetic identity” (Keener 2009, 234).

The Danger of Spiritual Pride

Perceiving the U.S. as a chosen nation fosters arrogance (ga’avah, גַּאֲוָה; Psalm 10:2), entitlement, and justification of injustice, resonating with biblical admonitions. Revelation 3:14–22 (ESV) rebukes Laodicea: “You say, I am rich… and have need of nothing, and do not know that you are wretched, pitiable, poor, blind, and naked.” The Greek plouteō (πλουτέω, to be rich) and ptōchos (πτωχός, poor) expose spiritual delusion (BDAG 2000, s.v. “πλουτέω,” “πτωχός”). Isaiah 47 (ESV) foretells Babylon’s fall: “You said, ‘I shall be a lady forever,’… but evil shall come upon you,” reflecting zadon (זָדוֹן, insolence; Isaiah 13:11).

American exceptionalism—Manifest Destiny, westward expansion, and modern militarism—embodies this pride. Brueggemann cautions, “Nations claiming divine favor often rationalize ‘awel (עַוֶל, oppression) under the guise of mishpat” (Brueggemann 2001, 89). The U.S.’s history of slavery, indigenous displacement, and global interventions mirrors judged empires like Assyria (ashshur, אַשּׁוּר; Isaiah 10:5–6), not Israel’s redemptive tzedakah (צְדָקָה, righteousness). John Howard Yoder observes, “Such pride distorts the shalom (שָׁלוֹם, peace) God intends” (Yoder 1994, 67).

The Peril of Christian Nationalism

Christian Nationalism—a movement proclaiming the U.S. as a divinely mandated Christian nation—perverts biblical theology. It merges faith with political authority, misapplying 2 Chronicles 7:14 (“if my people… humble themselves and pray”), originally directed to Israel’s ‘am (עַם, people) for teshuvah (תְּשׁוּבָה, repentance). Bauckham warns, “Revelation condemns the fusion of religious and imperial exousia (ἐξουσία, authority), as seen in the thērion (θηρίον, beast) worship” (Bauckham 1993, 93; Revelation 13:4).

This ideology fosters division, elevating American agapē (ἀγάπη, love) to nationalistic ends and justifying policies—e.g., immigration restrictions or military actions—that defy mishpat (מִשְׁפָּט). Brueggemann notes, “Christian Nationalism mirrors Babylon’s shachats (שַׁחַץ, prideful self-deification), clashing with God’s mamlakah (מַמְלָכָה, kingdom)” (Brueggemann 2001, 90). On August 20, 2025, amid escalating identity debates, it threatens to sever the church from its prophetic nevu’ah (נְבוּאָה, prophecy), substituting Christ’s kyriotes (κυριότης, lordship) with a national idol. Stanley Hauerwas condemns it as “a theological heresy that fractures the koinōnia (κοινωνία, fellowship) of the gospel” (Hauerwas 2001, 89).

Kingdom Allegiance Comes First

Christians’ primary citizenship resides in God’s kingdom, not any nation. Philippians 3:20 (ESV) declares, “Our citizenship is in heaven.” The Greek politeuma (πολίτευμα, citizenship) denotes a heavenly politeia (πολιτεία, commonwealth; BDAG 2000, s.v. “πολίτευμα”), transcending earthly borders. John Stott asserts, “The church’s allegiance to Christ’s dikaiosynē (δικαιοσύνη, righteousness) often conflicts with national nomos (νόμος, law)” (Stott 1992, 82). Jesus’ directive, “Apodote… tō theō ta tou theou” (Ἀπόδοτε… τῷ θεῷ τὰ τοῦ θεοῦ, Render to God what is God’s; Matthew 22:21), delineates political from covenantal identity.

Bauckham adds, “Revelation calls believers to resist archē (ἀρχή, ruling powers), aligning with the arnion (ἀρνίον, Lamb) reign” (Bauckham 1993, 92). The U.S., like Rome, wields dynamis, but Christians must critique its hamartia (ἁμαρτία, sin; Revelation 13:11–18). Political identity cannot override the covenantal diathēkē (διαθήκη) rooted in Christ.

Key Takeaway: Blessing Without Covenant

America may receive blessing (eulogia, εὐλογία; 1 Timothy 2:1–2), and Christians can intercede for its leaders, but it lacks covenantal charis (χάρις, favor) or divine mandate for national ambition. God’s promises remain tethered to Israel’s zera‘ and His eternal aionios (αἰώνιος, everlasting) plan (Romans 11:28–29). Our focus must be spiritual, ethical, and global—embodying agapē and mishpat—rather than nationalistic. Wright concludes, “The church’s mission is to manifest God’s basileia (βασιλεία), not to consecrate national agendas” (Wright 2013, 154).

Bibliography

Bauckham, Richard. 1993. The Theology of the Book of Revelation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brueggemann, Walter. 2001. Theology of the Old Testament: Testimony, Dispute, Advocacy. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

Brown, Francis, Samuel R. Driver, and Charles A. Briggs. 1906. A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hauerwas, Stanley. 2001. The Hauerwas Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Kaiser, Walter C., Jr. 1995. Introduction to the Old Testament: A Survey of the Hebrew Scriptures. Chicago: Moody Publishers.

Keener, Craig S. 2009. Romans. New Covenant Commentary Series. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.

Soulen, R. Kendall. 1996. The God of Israel and Christian Theology. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

Stott, John R.W. 1992. The Message of Romans: God’s Good News for the World. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

Wright, N.T. 2013. Paul and the Faithfulness of God. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

Yoder, John Howard. 1994. The Politics of Jesus. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

No Bible posts, no theological lessons today, folks.

Today is a very hard day for me and my family. On August 20, 2009, my son, Chance Miracle Parsons, was born—and passed away just a few hours later.

While we do not feel hopeless, I would be lying if I said we do not still mourn. The pain is real in the here and now, but we trust it will be vanquished in the future.

—Eric

Introduction

The question of Israel’s place in God’s redemptive narrative ranks among the most emotionally charged and theologically intricate issues confronting the contemporary church. For some, unreserved support for Israel is a divine imperative, rooted in ancient covenants and eschatological promises. For others, the harsh realities of modern conflict—war, civilian casualties, and human suffering—make blind allegiance ethically untenable. This tension necessitates a biblical definition of “support,” distinct from political agendas or cultural loyalties. N.T. Wright observes, “The biblical story uses Israel as a conduit for God’s kingdom, not as an object of uncritical devotion” (Wright 2013, 145). This post explores God’s covenant with Israel through detailed Hebrew and Greek exegesis, examines justice as a covenantal cornerstone, analyzes Jesus’ model of loyalty and mercy, critiques uncritical alignment, and proposes a balanced approach, enriched by scholars like Richard Bauckham and Walter Brueggemann.

God’s Covenant with Israel: Everlasting Yet Conditional

God’s relationship with Israel is forged through enduring covenants, yet these are laden with ethical obligations. Genesis 12:1–3 (ESV) establishes the Abrahamic covenant: “I will make of you a great nation… I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.” The Hebrew berakah (blessing) encompasses material prosperity, divine protection, and a redemptive mission for humanity (BDB 1906, s.v. “ברך”). Genesis 17:7–8 (ESV) expands, “I will establish my covenant between me and you and your offspring… for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and to your offspring after you. And I will give to you and to your offspring after you the land of your sojournings, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession.” The term ‘ôlām (everlasting) signifies permanence, but its realization depends on covenantal fidelity (BDB 1906, s.v. “עולם”).

Paul reinforces this in Romans 11:29 (ESV): “The gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.” The Greek ametamelēta (irrevocable) highlights God’s unwavering faithfulness (pistos theos; BDAG 2000, s.v. “ἀμεταμέλητος”). Gentiles are grafted into Israel’s olive tree (Romans 11:17–18), sharing the rhiza (root), not replacing it (Wright 2013, 148). Walter Brueggemann asserts, “The covenant’s irrevocability is tempered by Israel’s call to reflect God’s justice” (Brueggemann 2001, 28). Deuteronomy 28:1–14 promises blessings for obedience, while verses 15–68 detail curses, including exile, for disobedience. Walter Kaiser contends, “The land promise is eternal, but its possession hinges on covenantal obedience” (Kaiser 1995, 112). This dual nature—unbreakable promise with conditional fulfillment—shapes a nuanced Christian stance.

Justice Is Not Optional: The Covenantal Core

Justice (mishpat) is the ethical heartbeat of God’s covenants, reflecting His impartial nature. Deuteronomy 10:19 (ESV) commands, “Love the sojourner, therefore, for you were sojourners in the land of Egypt.” The Hebrew ger (sojourner) denotes foreigners or refugees, mandating protection and inclusion (BDB 1906, s.v. “גר”). Exodus 23:9 (ESV) reiterates, “You shall not oppress a sojourner.” Zechariah 7:9–10 (ESV) directs, “Render true judgments, show kindness and mercy… do not oppress the widow, the fatherless, the sojourner, or the poor.” Psalm 146:7–9 (ESV) portrays God upholding the oppressed (ashuqim) and stranger, embodying mishpat and tsedeqah (righteousness).

Amos 5:24 (ESV) proclaims, “Let justice roll down like waters, and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream.” This pairing of mishpat and tsedeqah critiques Israel’s ritualism without justice (Isaiah 1:16–17). Brueggemann writes, “Justice is the covenant’s ethical core, mirroring God’s relational holiness” (Brueggemann 2001, 56). John Stott adds, “God’s blessing on Israel was never unconditional; it demanded justice for the marginalized” (Stott 1992, 78). Historical instances—e.g., the exile (2 Kings 17:7–23)—demonstrate God’s judgment when justice faltered, underscoring that covenantal support must align with divine ethics.

Following Jesus’ Example: Covenant Fidelity and Universal Mercy

Jesus exemplifies the integration of covenant loyalty and universal mercy. He affirms Israel’s role in John 4:22 (ESV): “Salvation is from the Jews.” Matthew 15:24 (ESV) states, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” Yet, He extends grace to outsiders: the Samaritan woman (John 4:1–42), the Syrophoenician woman (Matthew 15:21–28), and the Roman centurion (Matthew 8:5–13). The Parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25–37) redefines neighborly love (agapē) across ethnic boundaries (BDAG 2000, s.v. “ἀγάπη”).

Jesus critiques Israel’s leaders (Matthew 23:1–36) and condemns sin universally (John 8:3–11). Craig Keener notes, “Jesus fulfills Israel’s covenantal role by extending mishpat and hesed (mercy) to all nations” (Keener 1999, 243). Richard Bauckham adds, “Jesus’ ministry prefigures Revelation’s vision of a just kingdom, where ethnic divisions dissolve in worship” (Bauckham 1993, 89). Christians must affirm Israel’s covenantal status while advocating mercy, mirroring Christ’s impartial agapē.

The Danger of Choosing Sides Uncritically

Uncritical support for Israel risks conflating theology with geopolitics, a pitfall Bauckham warns against: “Revelation critiques imperial allegiances, summoning the church to resist oppression” (Bauckham 1993, 88). Revelation 7:9 (ESV) envisions redemption from “every nation, tribe, people and language.” Romans 2:11 (ESV) affirms, “God shows no partiality.” Psalm 2:8–12 calls all nations, including Israel, to submit to God’s Son.

Historically, the Zionist movement (1897), Balfour Declaration (1917), and Israel’s 1948 establishment involved Palestinian dispossession, notably the Nakba, displacing over 700,000 Palestinians (Morris 2001, 345). The Six-Day War (1967) and subsequent occupation intensified tensions. John Stott cautions, “Support for Israel must not overlook Palestinian suffering” (Stott 1992, 80). Brueggemann notes, “The church must lament injustice on all sides, aligning with God’s mishpat” (Brueggemann 2001, 89). Loyalty to Christ, not nations, must guide Christian engagement.

Questions for the Church: Theological Discernment

Faithful engagement requires rigorous questions:

• Historical and Biblical Context: Can the Nakba (1948) and Israel’s covenantal promises be held in tension without bias?
• Covenant and Character: How do God’s promises to Israel intersect with His mishpat and tsedeqah?
• Justice and Protection: How can Christians pray for Jewish safety and Palestinian dignity, resisting political distortion?

Brueggemann suggests, “The church’s prophetic role lies in holding covenant and justice in creative tension” (Brueggemann 2001, 90).

A Balanced Biblical Support: Theological and Practical Steps

Supporting Israel biblically means honoring covenants while pursuing justice. Psalm 122:6 (ESV): “Pray for the peace of Jerusalem” (shalom, wholeness; BDB 1906, s.v. “שלום”). Isaiah 2:4 (ESV) envisions, “Nation shall not lift up sword against nation.” Practical steps include:

• Intercessory Prayer: Seek shalom for Israel and Palestinians, per Romans 12:18 (ESV): “If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all.”
• Justice Advocacy: Support human rights initiatives, aligning with Micah 6:8 (ESV): “Do justice, love kindness, walk humbly with your God.”
• Education and Dialogue: Study covenant theology (e.g., Wright 2013) and engage historical narratives (e.g., Morris 2001), fostering empathy.
• Rejection of Extremes: Condemn antisemitism (Romans 11:28) and oppression (Amos 5:24), echoing Bauckham’s call to resist imperial injustice (Bauckham 1993, 90).

Keener concludes, “Blessing Israel involves covenantal affirmation and justice, reflecting Christ’s redemptive mission” (Keener 2009, 278).

Conclusion: A Faithful Witness in a Fractured World

Christians must support Israel through a biblical lens—affirming God’s irrevocable covenants while embodying His justice and mercy. The tension between covenant and ethics mirrors God’s character, calling the church to pray for peace, advocate for the oppressed, and bear witness to Christ’s kingdom amid conflict.

Bibliography

Bauckham, Richard. 1993. The Theology of the Book of Revelation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brueggemann, Walter. 2001. Theology of the Old Testament: Testimony, Dispute, Advocacy. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

Brown, Francis, Samuel R. Driver, and Charles A. Briggs. 1906. A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Keener, Craig S. 1999. A Commentary on the Gospel of Matthew. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Keener, Craig S. 2009. Romans. New Covenant Commentary Series. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.

Kaiser, Walter C., Jr. 1995. Introduction to the Old Testament: A Survey of the Hebrew Scriptures. Chicago: Moody Publishers.

Morris, Benny. 2001. Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist-Arab Conflict, 1881–2001. New York: Vintage Books.

Stott, John R.W. 1992. The Message of Romans: God’s Good News for the World. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

Wright, N.T. 2013. Paul and the Faithfulness of God. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

Introduction

As we delve deeper into our study of Revelation, it is imperative to explore the literary genre and intent behind this enigmatic text. The book has been subject to myriad interpretations, yet its core identity as an apocalypse demands careful consideration. In contemporary parlance, “apocalypse” evokes images of cataclysm and eschatological finality, yet its original Greek meaning, derived from apokalypsis (ἀποκάλυψις, unveiling or revelation; BDAG 2000, s.v. “ἀποκάλυψις”), signifies revelatory literature framed within a narrative structure—not all of which address end-times events. N.T. Wright notes, “Revelation unveils divine realities, not merely foretells doom, aligning with its apocalyptic roots” (Wright 2013, 189). This post examines the nature of apocalypse, John’s threefold purpose, sources and influences, unique features, its role as a circular letter, symbolic framework, liturgical essence, theopolitical dimension, and concluding insights, enriched with Greek exegesis and contributions from Richard Bauckham, Michael Gorman, and Mitchell Reddish.

The Nature of Apocalypse

Revelation’s classification as an apocalypse requires nuanced understanding. The term apokalypsis (Revelation 1:1) denotes a divine disclosure, often through visions, contrasting with modern associations of destruction. John’s purpose, as inferred from the text, is threefold:

1. To disclose a transcendent perspective (hyperouranios horasis): To reveal the heavenly realm beyond human perception (Revelation 4:1).
2. To present the contemporary world from a heavenly vantage (ouranios skopos): To reinterpret earthly realities through divine eyes (Revelation 11:15).
3. To answer the question: “Who is truly the Kyrios of the cosmos?”: In a first-century context of Roman persecution, where citizens were coerced to acclaim the emperor as kyrios (lord) and theos (god; BDAG 2000, s.v. “κύριος,” “θεός”), this was a radical assertion of Christ’s sovereignty (Revelation 19:16).

For modern Christians, Christ’s lordship seems self-evident, yet under Domitian’s reign (c. 81–96 CE), such a confession invited martyrdom. Richard Bauckham observes, “Revelation’s apocalyptic unveiling counters imperial claims, affirming Christ as pantokratōr (all-ruler; Revelation 1:8)” (Bauckham 1993, 23).

Sources and Influences

John’s composition reflects diverse influences, necessitating a scholarly lens. This study draws heavily on Michael Gorman (Reading Revelation Responsibly), Richard Bauckham (The Theology of the Book of Revelation), and Mitchell Reddish (Revelation: Smyth & Helwys Bible Commentary), with supplementary insights from David deSilva and Bruce Metzger. Popular works by LaHaye and Lindsey are noted only as counterpoints, lacking rigorous exegesis.

Bauckham posits Revelation as a triadic genre: apocalypse, prophecy, and circular letter. The apocalyptic and prophetic elements are evident—apokalypsis (Revelation 1:1) and propheteia (prophecy; Revelation 1:3)—while the circular letter aspect, though subtler, emerges in the epistles to the seven churches (Revelation 2–3). Prophecy, from prophēteuō (to speak forth; BDAG 2000, s.v. “προφητεύω”), involves divine communication through chosen agents, not solely future-telling. Bauckham adds, “Christian prophecy, typically oral in worship (leitourgia), gained detail when written, as John did from Patmos” (Bauckham 1993, 25).

John’s reliance on Jewish texts—Daniel, Exodus, Leviticus—is not plagiarism but a rootedness for his audience. The Greek anagnōsis (reading; Revelation 1:3) implies these echoes were intelligible to early readers.

Why Revelation Stands Apart

Certain features distinguish Revelation from typical prophecy. Its vivid imagery—e.g., thēria (beasts; Revelation 13:1) and ouranoi (heavens; Revelation 4:1)—exceeds the narrative style of Isaiah or Jeremiah. Unlike Jewish prophecy’s episodic accounts, Revelation offers a singular vision (1:10–22:6), designed to transform perception. Moreover, while Jewish apocalypses were often pseudepigraphal (e.g., 1 Enoch), John writes under his own name, per divine command (grapson, write; Revelation 1:11), unlike Daniel’s sealing (sphragizō, seal; Daniel 12:4, LXX).

Revelation as a Circular Letter

Bauckham’s argument for Revelation as a circular letter is compelling. The tailored messages to the seven churches (Revelation 2–3)—with blessings and warnings to five, except Smyrna and Philadelphia—suggest public readings. The refrain, “Ho echōn ous akousatō ti to pneuma legei tais ekklēsiais” (Let anyone with ears hear what the Spirit says to the churches; Revelation 2:7), underscores universal application, akin to Paul’s epistles (epistolē; BDAG 2000, s.v. “ἐπιστολή”).

Clarifying the Genre: Apocalypse, Prophecy, and Letter

Reddish and Gorman affirm Revelation’s apocalyptic nature, with Gorman emphasizing genre’s interpretive weight. He reframes it as “apocalyptic prophecy in circular letter form,” countering its misreading as doom-laden. Gorman suggests, “A better title might be ‘Following the Lamb into the New Creation,’ highlighting euangelion (good news; Revelation 14:6)” (Gorman 2011, 34). This shifts focus to Christ’s victory (nikē, Revelation 17:14), not despair.

Revelation as Cosmic Travelogue

John’s ascent (anabēthi hōde, come up here; Revelation 4:1) initiates a cosmic travelogue, a narrative of heavenly sights (horama; Revelation 9:17). His challenge was to convey apokalypsis through human logos (word), limited by language’s scope.

The Symbolism of Revelation

Revelation’s symbols—e.g., arnion (Lamb; Revelation 5:6) and drakōn (dragon; Revelation 12:3)—are context-specific, not timeless codes. John subverts Roman propaganda, likening its pax Romana to Jezebel (Iezabel, Revelation 2:20). Familiarity with Old Testament imagery (eikōn, image; Revelation 13:14) is crucial, per Metzger, “Symbols reflect John’s historical milieu, not abstract prophecy” (Metzger 1993, 45).

Liturgy and Worship in Revelation

Revelation’s liturgical core—latreia (worship; Revelation 7:15)—calls believers to honor the theos alēthinos (true God; Revelation 6:10), rejecting false eidōla (idols; Revelation 9:20). Its narrative of creation, redemption (lytrōsis, Revelation 5:9), and restoration inspires hymns, centering on doxa (glory; Revelation 21:23).

The Theopolitical Dimension

Revelation’s theopolitical thrust challenges Roman emperor worship (sebas, reverence; Revelation 13:4). Refusal, as with Antipas (Revelation 2:13), invited thlipsis (persecution; BDAG 2000, s.v. “θλῖψις”). John’s symbols—e.g., thērion (beast)—critique Domitian’s dynamis (power; Revelation 13:2), asserting Christ’s basileia (kingdom; Revelation 11:15). This extends to modern empires, including the U.S., where nationalism risks eidōlolatreia (idolatry).

Conclusion: What Kind of Book is Revelation?

As Dr. Andy Johnson describes, Revelation is a “theopoetic, theopolitical pastoral-prophetic text,” offering hope (elpis, Revelation 21:4), redemption (apolytrōsis, Revelation 5:9), and restoration (kainē ktisis, new creation; Revelation 21:1). It unveils Christ’s nikē (victory), guiding us toward God’s telos (purpose).

Bibliography

Bauckham, Richard. 1993. The Theology of the Book of Revelation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gorman, Michael J. 2011. Reading Revelation Responsibly: Uncivil Worship and Witness. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.

Metzger, Bruce M. 1993. Breaking the Code: Understanding the Book of Revelation. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.

Reddish, Mitchell G. 2001. Revelation. Smyth & Helwys Bible Commentary. Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys.

Wright, N.T. 2013. Paul and the Faithfulness of God. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

Introduction

One of the most divisive assertions within church circles—more contentious than debates over women’s ordination or entire sanctification—has been the claim that there is no “rapture” as popularly imagined. The narrative of a secret, pre-tribulation removal of believers, popularized by the Left Behind series and similar media, lacks solid biblical grounding. This perspective was shaped through a Master of Arts in Theological Studies program at Nazarene Theological Seminary, completed in 2020, which included an in-depth study of Revelation and leading a monthly Bible study on the book. The doctrine of the rapture is not only misunderstood but often constructed from isolated verses, ignoring broader biblical theology and context. This post examines 1 Thessalonians 4:13–18, the primary text cited for the rapture, through Greek exegesis, historical theology, and scriptural coherence, demonstrating that Christ’s return is a public, triumphant event, not a secret escape. The Greek harpazō (caught up) and parousia (coming) reveal a resurrection reunion, not a clandestine departure.

The Context of 1 Thessalonians 4:13–18

1 Thessalonians 4:13–18 (ESV) reads:

“But we do not want you to be uninformed, brothers, about those who are asleep, that you may not grieve as others do who have no hope. For since we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so, through Jesus, God will bring with him those who have fallen asleep. For this we declare to you by a word from the Lord, that we who are alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord, will not precede those who have fallen asleep. For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the sound of the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we will always be with the Lord. Therefore encourage one another with these words.”

Paul addresses the Thessalonian church’s grief over deceased believers, fearing they missed Christ’s return. The term “asleep” (koimaō, to sleep; BDAG 2000, s.v. “κοιμάω”) is a euphemism for death, emphasizing hope in resurrection (Bauckham 2010, 145). The passage comforts, assuring that the dead in Christ will participate in the parousia (coming of the Lord), a term denoting a king’s public arrival (BDAG 2000, s.v. “παρουσία”). This is not a secret event but a visible reunion.

The phrase “caught up” (harpazō, to seize or snatch; BDAG 2000, s.v. “ἁρπάζω”) describes believers meeting the Lord in the air, but the context is resurrection, not rapture. David DeSilva notes, “Paul’s imagery draws from imperial processions, where citizens meet a returning king outside the city” (DeSilva 2018, 89). The “trumpet of God” (salpigx, trumpet; Revelation 11:15) signals a public, triumphant event, not a stealthy escape (Keener 2009, 247).

Misunderstandings of the Rapture Doctrine

The rapture doctrine, as popularly taught, originates from 19th-century dispensationalism, popularized by John Nelson Darby and the Scofield Reference Bible (1909). It posits a pre-tribulation, secret removal of believers, leaving the world in chaos. This view relies on a literalist reading of 1 Thessalonians 4, ignoring its comforting purpose and broader eschatology (Bauckham 2010, 132). Norman Geisler, while not a dispensationalist, critiques similar misreadings, noting that building theology on isolated verses leads to error (Geisler 2005, 278).

The rapture narrative assumes a seven-year tribulation, with believers spared. However, 1 Thessalonians 4 describes Christ’s descent (katabainō, to descend; BDAG 2000, s.v. “καταβαίνω”) with a “cry of command” (keleusma, shout; BDAG 2000, s.v. “κέλευσμα”), archangel’s voice, and trumpet—public fanfare, not secrecy. The “meeting in the air” (apantēsis, meeting; BDAG 2000, s.v. “ἀπάντησις”) echoes ancient customs where citizens met returning rulers outside the city, escorting them in triumph (DeSilva 2018, 90). Believers meet Christ, not to flee earth, but to join His victorious return.

Historical and Theological Context

Dispensationalism, emerging in the 1830s with Darby, divided history into “dispensations,” with the church raptured before the tribulation. This view gained traction through the Scofield Bible and media like Left Behind, but it’s a modern construct, unknown to the early church (Wright 2019, 78). John Wesley, in his Explanatory Notes on the New Testament (1755), interpreted 1 Thessalonians 4 as the resurrection at Christ’s visible return, not a secret rapture (Wesley 1872, 3:456). Dr. Andy Johnson, a Nazarene scholar, emphasizes Revelation’s parousia as a public event, calling believers to endure tribulation with hope, not escape it (Johnson 2017, 89).

The early church fathers, like Irenaeus (Against Heresies 5.31.1, ca. 180 CE), viewed Christ’s return as a single, visible event with resurrection, not multiple stages (Holmes 2007, 457). The Nicene Creed (325 CE) affirms “He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead,” with no mention of a pre-tribulation rapture. This historical consensus supports a unified eschatology, where believers face trials but are sustained by God’s grace.

The Broader Biblical Theology: Hope in Resurrection

Paul’s emphasis is hope: the dead in Christ rise first, then the living are “caught up” to meet Him (1 Thessalonians 4:16–17). This mirrors 1 Corinthians 15:51–52 (ESV): “We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet.” The salpigx (trumpet) signals the same event—the resurrection at Christ’s parousia (BDAG 2000, s.v. “σάλπιγξ”). Matthew 24:31 (ESV) describes the Son of Man sending angels “with a loud trumpet call” to gather the elect, echoing Paul’s imagery. No secret rapture here—just a glorious, public reunion.

The Thessalonian church feared the dead missed Christ’s return, but Paul assures unity in resurrection. As Beale notes, “The harpazō is not escape but participation in Christ’s descent, a triumphant escort” (Beale 2015, 278). This hope counters fear, encouraging believers to “encourage one another” (1 Thessalonians 4:18).

No Secret Rapture: A Public, Triumphant Event

The rapture doctrine posits a secret removal of believers before tribulation, but scripture portrays Christ’s return as visible and dramatic. Revelation 1:7 (ESV) says, “Behold, he is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him.” The Greek erchomai (coming) and horaō (see) emphasize universality (BDAG 2000, s.v. “ἔρχομαι,” “ὁράω”). Jesus warns of false christs claiming secret returns (Matthew 24:26–27, ESV: “For as the lightning comes from the east and shines as far as the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man”). The parousia is like lightning—unmissable.

Dispensationalism’s pre-tribulation rapture lacks explicit biblical support, relying on a misreading of harpazō as a separate event from the second coming. Paul’s “word from the Lord” (1 Thessalonians 4:15) aligns with Jesus’ teachings in Matthew 24, where the gathering follows tribulation (Matthew 24:29–31). Johnson argues, “The rapture is a modern invention, distorting Paul’s hope in resurrection” (Johnson 2017, 92). The early church expected to endure trials, as seen in Revelation 7:14 (ESV): “They have come out of the great tribulation.”

Theological Implications: Endurance, Not Escape

The rapture doctrine can foster escapism, discouraging engagement with the world. Wesley warned against such views, emphasizing endurance through grace (Wesley 1872, 3:456). The Bible calls believers to suffer with Christ (Romans 8:17, ESV: “if indeed we suffer with him so that we may also be glorified with him”). Tribulation (thlipsis, pressure; BDAG 2000, s.v. “θλῖψις”) refines faith, as in Revelation 3:18 (ESV): “I counsel you to buy from me gold refined by fire.” The church’s mission is witness amid trials, not evacuation.

This ties to the gospel’s call to voluntary faith (pisteuō, John 3:16). If the rapture spares believers from suffering, it undermines the cross’s model of victory through sacrifice. As Bauckham notes, “Revelation’s hope is not escape but faithful endurance, conquering as the Lamb conquered” (Bauckham 2010, 145).

Conclusion: Christ’s Return – A Glorious Reunion

1 Thessalonians 4:13–18 offers hope in resurrection, not a secret rapture. The parousia is a public triumph, where the dead in Christ rise and the living are “caught up” to meet Him. This comforts the grieving, encouraging faithfulness amid trials. Dispensationalism’s rapture narrative, a 19th-century innovation, distorts scripture’s unified eschatology. The church’s call is endurance, not escape, witnessing God’s kingdom until Christ returns in glory.

Bibliography

Bauer, Walter, Frederick W. Danker, William F. Arndt, and F. Wilbur Gingrich. 2000. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bauckham, Richard. 2010. Reading Revelation Responsibly: Uncivil Worship and Witness. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.

Beale, G.K. 2015. Revelation: A Shorter Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

DeSilva, David A. 2018. Unholy Allegiances: Heeding Revelation’s Warning. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers.

Fee, Gordon D. 1987. The First Epistle to the Corinthians. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Geisler, Norman L. 2005. Systematic Theology: Volume Four: Church, Last Things. Minneapolis, MN: Bethany House.

Johnson, Andy. 2017. Holiness and the Missio Dei. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.

Keener, Craig S. 2009. The Gospel of Matthew: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Scofield, C.I. 1909. Scofield Reference Bible. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wesley, John. 1872. The Works of John Wesley. Edited by Thomas Jackson. 14 vols. London: Wesleyan Methodist Book Room.

Wright, N.T. 2019. Surprised by Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church. New York: HarperOne.