Tag: christianity

  • What Holiness Is… and Isn’t

    Holiness is a word used an awful lot in Christian theology — “holy,” “holiness,” “be holy,” etc. The problem is that it’s clear many people who throw the word around don’t actually know what it means, including some well-known and respected theologians (I’ll not name the one I’m thinking of… but boy, he’s pretty far off base).

    I was ordained in the Nazarene tradition, a Wesleyan-Holiness denomination. Holiness — specifically the doctrine of Entire Sanctification — is a major distinctive in the Church of the Nazarene. I still believe this emphasis is thoroughly biblical, and dismissing holiness as unimportant is simply contrary to Scripture.

    Leviticus makes it plain: “Be holy, because I am holy” (Leviticus 11:44-45; 1 Peter 1:15-16).

    Ah! So we’re supposed to be perfect like God? Got it.

    …No. That’s not what it means.

    At its root, “holy” means set apart. Distinct. Different. It means your life is increasingly marked by the character of God rather than the patterns of the world around you. People should be able to tell something is different about you — not primarily by what you say, but by how you live, especially when you don’t think anyone is watching.

    Where I Diverge from Some Holiness Traditions

    This is where the Church of the Nazarene and I began to diverge in practice. Too often, holiness got reduced to a list of external rules: no movies, no dancing, no alcohol, no “shiny objects,” no fun. (I may be exaggerating slightly, but not by much.)

    That’s not holiness.

    Going to see Gnomeo and Juliet isn’t inherently evil (unless we’re counting terrible movies as a sin). Enjoying a single beer with dinner or after mowing the lawn isn’t sinful either. Scripture doesn’t say “never drink alcohol.” It says don’t get drunk (Ephesians 5:18; Proverbs 23:29-35). Paul even told Timothy to drink a little wine for his stomach (1 Timothy 5:23).

    The obsession with external rules was often more about maintaining a certain image than about heart transformation. Jesus had strong words for that kind of religion:

    “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within are full of dead people’s bones and all uncleanness.” (Matthew 23:27)

    Performative Christianity — looking holy on the outside while the inside remains unchanged — is not holiness. It’s exactly what Jesus condemned.

    Real-World Examples of Confusion

    We see this confusion played out publicly today.

    Take Sophie Rain, the OnlyFans creator who claims she can do porn and still “love Jesus” with no need for repentance. She says things like “God is very forgiving,” which is true — God is very forgiving. But forgiveness is not a license to keep sinning. Jesus never said “come as you are and stay as you are.” He said “come as you are and follow me” — which includes repentance and transformation (Mark 1:15; Luke 5:32). Any porn actress (or anyone else) who argues that God is cool with porn is simply ignoring the clear biblical call to holiness and repentance. That’s not freedom. That’s self-deception.

    On the other side, some churches (like Xenos, now Dwell) have dismissed any strong call to repentance as “legalism,” while simultaneously practicing church discipline against members struggling with same-sex attraction. That’s inconsistent at best. You can’t preach “no rules, just grace” and then selectively enforce rules when it suits you. True holiness avoids both cheap grace and harsh legalism.

    What Holiness Actually Is

    Holiness is being set apart for God.

    It is the Holy Spirit progressively making us more like Jesus in character, love, integrity, purity, and obedience. It has two inseparable sides:

    • Separation from the sinful patterns of this world.
    • Consecration to God — heart, mind, will, and body.

    Christian perfection (or Entire Sanctification) is not absolute perfection. That won’t happen until we are in God’s presence (Philippians 3:12; 1 John 1:8). Think of it like lane assist in a car: the Spirit gently nudges you back when you start to drift, but you can still override it if you’re determined to drive into oncoming traffic. Holiness is that ongoing nudging toward Christlikeness.

    My mentor Dr. Rob McCorkle has described it well: when we’re born, we’re rooted in depravity. After salvation, the “bungee cord” that pulls us toward sin is gradually replaced by a new default — being drawn toward what is holy. We can still override it, but we’re more naturally compelled toward goodness.

    In other words, true holiness is a reflection of God’s character — however imperfectly we live it out. It is not something we try our way into through sheer willpower. It is a work of grace that resets our default nature.

    Holiness is not the enemy of joy — it is the path to real joy. It is not opposed to love — it is love’s fullest expression. It is not about earning God’s favor — it is the grateful response to the favor we’ve already received in Christ.

    We will never be perfect in this life, but we are called to grow in holiness until the day we see Him face to face (1 John 3:2-3).

    That’s what holiness is.

    Everything else is just noise.

  • America Was Never Intended to Be a “Christian Nation”

    There’s a lot of talk these days about America being a “Christian nation.” Some treat the idea as obvious history. Others treat any challenge to it as an attack on Christianity itself. Both sides are missing the actual point.

    The United States was never intended to be a theocracy or an officially Christian nation.

    The proof is written directly into the First Amendment:

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”

    That first clause — the Establishment Clause — was deliberate. The founders had watched Europe tear itself apart for centuries with state churches, forced conversions, religious wars, and persecution of dissenters. They wanted no part of that on American soil (Madison, Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments, 1785; McConnell, 2000).

    They were not trying to create a secular utopia. Most of the founders and early citizens were Christians of various kinds. But they were also painfully aware of what happens when government and one particular form of religion become too tightly entangled.

    Important clarification: There is NO “separation of church and state” in the Constitution

    The exact phrase “separation of church and state” never appears in the Constitution. It originated in a private 1802 letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association, where Jefferson used the metaphor of a “wall of separation” to reassure the Baptists that the federal government would not interfere with their religious liberty or establish a national church (Jefferson to Danbury Baptists, January 1, 1802; Dreisbach, 2002; Hamburger, 2002).

    Jefferson was expressing his preference that the federal government stay out of religious matters, not that religion must be banished from public life. In fact, the First Amendment does two things at once:

    • It prevents the federal government from establishing an official religion or favoring one denomination over another.
    • It protects the free exercise of religion — meaning the state is permitted to participate in and benefit from religious influence, as long as it does not coerce belief or establish a state church (McConnell, 2000; Treaty of Tripoli, Article 11, ratified 1797 under Adams).

    The founders expected religion (especially Christianity) to have a healthy, public role in shaping morality and virtue. They simply did not want the government forcing people into one form of it.

    What the founders actually believed

    They assumed a moral and religious people would be necessary for the republic to survive. Washington, Adams, and others said this repeatedly (Washington, Farewell Address, 1796; Adams to Massachusetts Militia, 1798). They believed Christian ethics generally produced good citizens. But they deliberately rejected the idea of an official Christian theocracy with enforced religious conformity (Madison, Memorial and Remonstrance, 1785; Curry, 1986).

    This is very different from the “Christian nationalism” talk we hear today. The founders were protecting religious liberty for everyone — including future Jews, Muslims, atheists, and dissenters within Christianity — because they understood that once government picks a favored religion, freedom eventually dies (McConnell, 2000; Dreisbach, 2002).

    Why this matters now

    When Christians today insist that America must be legally recognized as a “Christian nation,” they are often arguing for something the founders intentionally avoided. When secularists claim there must be a total “separation of church and state,” they are reading into the Constitution something that isn’t there.

    Jesus Himself refused to use political power to advance His kingdom. When the crowd tried to make Him king by force, He withdrew. When Pilate asked if He was a king, Jesus replied, “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36).

    The gospel advances by persuasion and transformation of the heart, not by legislation or state power.

    Christians should be salt and light in every nation — including America. We should advocate for justice, morality, and human flourishing. But we should never confuse political power with the Kingdom of God.

    America was founded as a constitutional republic with religious liberty, not as a theocracy. The founders knew the difference. We should too.


    Citations:

    • James Madison, Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments (1785)
    • Michael W. McConnell, “Why is Religious Liberty the ‘First Freedom’?” (2000)
    • Daniel L. Dreisbach, Thomas Jefferson and the Wall of Separation Between Church and State (2002)
    • Philip Hamburger, Separation of Church and State (2002)
    • George Washington, Farewell Address (1796)
    • Treaty of Tripoli, Article 11 (1797)
    • Thomas J. Curry, The First Freedoms: Church and State in America to the Passage of the First Amendment (1986)
  • There Is No “Science vs. Religion” War — And Both Sides Need to Stop Pretending There Is

    There really is no “science vs. religion” war — or at least, there shouldn’t be.

    Yet certain loud voices keep trying to force one. On one side you have Seth MacFarlane, who likes to mock Christians as believers in a “Sky Daddy” and once claimed creationists are less intelligent than people with severe cognitive disabilities. On the other side sits Ken Ham, who insists Genesis 1 must be read as six literal 24-hour days and treats anyone who disagrees as a closet atheist or compromiser.

    I have almost zero respect for either man. Both are thin-skinned pseudointellectuals who excel at insults but struggle with actual conversation unless their audience already agrees with them. Disagree with MacFarlane and you’ll get sarcasm or a reminder that he’s friends with Neil deGrasse Tyson. Disagree with Ham and you’ll be called a compromiser or worse. Both build strawmen, traffic in surface-level arguments, and prefer mockery over engagement.

    I’m using them only as stand-ins for the broader problem: far too many people on both sides act as if science and religion are inherently at war. They are not. Accepting this truth does not make you a traitor to your “side.”

    Let me be clear about my own position. I am not a Young Earth Creationist — I consider that position indefensible. I am not a deist. I am also not anti-science; I have a deep appreciation for astronomy and cosmology. At the same time, I am a Christian theologian who believes God created the universe and that Jesus rose from the dead. These things are not incompatible. It is the height of willful stupidity to insist they must be.

    The Problem Starts with Genesis 1–2

    Much of the unnecessary conflict comes from how people read the opening chapters of Genesis. A small but vocal group of Christians insists on six literal 24-hour days, a physical Garden of Eden, and a young earth. On the flip side, critics assume every Christian must hold that view and then mock the faith accordingly.

    Both approaches miss the mark.

    The key Hebrew word in Genesis 1 is yom (יוֹם). While it can mean a literal day, it frequently carries a broader, more flexible meaning — an epoch, an indefinite period of time, or simply “when” something occurred. This is the same word used in other parts of Scripture in clearly non-literal ways. Context matters. The sun is not created until the fourth “yom,” which already complicates a strict solar-day reading. The highly structured, poetic form of Genesis 1 (“evening and morning, the Xth yom”) strongly suggests literary framework rather than scientific chronology. The chapter is theological poetry declaring God’s sovereignty and order, not a modern scientific timetable.

    Science and Faith Are Compatible

    We have strong evidence that the universe is billions of years old: cosmic microwave background radiation, the formation of stars and heavier elements, and the fossil record. None of this precludes God. In fact, many serious thinkers on both sides of the faith question have long recognized that science and religion address different domains.

    Christian philosopher and theologian William Lane Craig has repeatedly affirmed that the Big Bang cosmology provides powerful scientific confirmation of the biblical doctrine of creation out of nothing. He argues that a universe with a finite beginning aligns with the theological claim that God created the cosmos. Far from seeing science as a threat, Craig sees modern cosmology as supportive of theism.¹

    Even some prominent atheists have acknowledged that science and faith are not inherently at war. The late paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould — a committed atheist — famously proposed the principle of “Non-Overlapping Magisteria” (NOMA). He argued that science and religion occupy entirely separate domains: science deals with empirical facts and natural processes, while religion addresses questions of meaning, morality, and ultimate purpose. Gould insisted there should be no conflict because the two magisteria do not overlap.²

    Atheists like MacFarlane often begin with the assumption “no supernatural cause is possible” and then act as if the data proves their starting point. That is not science — it is philosophical naturalism masquerading as neutrality. True science describes mechanisms and regularities; it does not dictate ultimate causes or rule out intelligent agency by fiat.

    As a Christian, I have no problem saying God initiated the universe, set its laws and initial conditions, and specially created life. I also have no problem accepting the Big Bang and an ancient cosmos. These are not in conflict. God is not threatened by good science, and good science is not threatened by the possibility of a Creator.

    The real tragedy is how many people on both sides have turned a false dichotomy into a tribal battle. Christians who demand young-earth literalism and atheists who treat any belief in God as anti-intellectual are equally guilty of intellectual laziness.

    Science and faith address different questions. Science asks “how?” Faith asks “why?” Both can coexist without one devouring the other.

    It’s time we stopped forcing them into conflict.


    Notes

    1. William Lane Craig, Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics, 3rd ed. (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2008), 111–156. See also William Lane Craig, “God and the Big Bang,” lecture, University of Hong Kong, October 2018.
    2. Stephen Jay Gould, “Nonoverlapping Magisteria,” Natural History 106 (March 1997): 16–22.
  • Why I Left, Part Two – And Why I’m Taking an Extended Break

    I’ve been away from writing for a while. Life has thrown several major changes at me since November, and I’ve needed time to recharge—new hobbies, long walks, home improvement projects, and just breathing. I’ve also spent a lot of time thinking.

    In being this honest, I’ve likely torpedoed any future chance of being hired at a church or teaching at a Christian college. That’s okay. I’ve taken my Sundays back. I’m relaxing in God’s creation, spending real time with my wife and kids, watching NASCAR, or doing whatever I want. I’m even considering starting a simple home church someday, but I’m not rushing into anything.

    I haven’t left the church forever. I’m just taking a long, intentional break.

    What follows will probably make some people angry or cost me a few friendships. That’s fine. With how I’ve chosen to spend my time now, it’s their loss, not mine.

    Here are some hard truths I’ve observed after years on staff (youth pastor, worship team, ordained elder, etc.):

    1. Stop telling people “I’ll pray for you.” It’s performative, and most people know it. It’s usually a quick way to end a conversation without actually doing anything. I stopped saying it a long time ago. If someone is on my heart, I reach out with encouragement or let them know I’ve already prayed.
    2. If you actually mean it, pray right then. I’ve only ever seen one person consistently do this without needing an audience—my friend Allen.
    3. James was right. If you see someone in need and simply say “be well” or “I’ll pray for you” without lifting a finger, your faith is useless (James 2). When my Muslim neighbor’s son had a wheel fall off his car, I didn’t offer empty words. I confirmed what was needed, bought the parts, and spent a couple hours fixing it. That’s what love in action looks like.
    4. The church has largely lost the art of real friendship. Too many “church friendships” are transactional. You’re friends as long as you’re useful—serving, attending, supporting the vision. Once you step back, the relationship often fades. In contrast, many of my secular friends have been far more consistent, honest, and loyal.
    5. There’s no drama like church drama. The pettiness, cliques, and over-the-top reactions to minor things I’ve witnessed are honestly bizarre.
    6. Leadership gossips. A LOT. Often more than the average person in the pews. I’ve heard leaders absolutely tear into people (especially those who left) behind their backs. It’s embarrassing.
    7. I’ve worked in the corporate world my entire adult life, and I’ve never seen the level of sabotage and favoritism I’ve seen in the church. Insecure people trying to dim someone else’s light to make their own look brighter is rampant—and it’s deeply disappointing.
    8. The church preaches “love” and “come as you are,” but only if you come as they expect. We loudly proclaim grace and unconditional love, yet the moment someone steps out of line—asking hard questions, challenging leadership, or struggling with same-sex attraction—the welcome mat gets yanked away. Jesus said “come as you are,” but the church too often adds “…but get your act together first.”
    9. Too many pastors are obsessed with church size rather than effectiveness. “Nickels and noses” drives too much decision-making. The world was changed by twelve scared-then-emboldened people. One preacher (I think it was Charles Moody but can’t remember for sure) discipled twelve people a year, who then each discipled twelve more. Within five years the impact was massive. It’s not “build my church.” It should be “build the Kingdom.” Bragging about an “online campus” with three viewers while ignoring real discipleship is missing the point.
    10. The church congratulates itself way too much. “We served 14 people dinner this year!” gets treated like a major victory. Who really cares? Did anyone grow spiritually, or are we just showing off? If it’s the latter, we’re spitting in Jesus’ face—our only reward is getting to brag about it.

    This isn’t true of every single person, but it’s well over fifty percent in my experience. The American church has drifted far from what Christ intended. We’re more worried about entertainment, smoke machines, ear-tickling sermons, beautiful buildings, and national politics than we are about Kingdom work. Meanwhile, the church in places like China grows rapidly in secret house gatherings, much like the early disciples.

    If this offends you, good. Maybe it will stir something in you to help be the change.

    I plan to write more regularly again. Some posts will be lighter. Some will be heavier. All of them will be honest.

  • Why I Left (and Where I Go From Here)

    It’s been quite a while since I last posted. I haven’t abandoned the blog, but I stepped away to get some things clear in my mind. A lot has happened.

    First, as I shared in my last post, my position at my employer of eight years was eliminated. That came as a complete shock, and I’m still processing it. In the aftermath, I also learned that some people I considered friends spoke about me in ways that were unkind. Gossip has a way of doing damage, whether intended or not. It’s unfortunate when people elevate themselves by diminishing others—especially those who aspire to leadership. A true leader lifts the people around them.

    I also resigned from Redemption City Church in December. To be fair, I wasn’t serving in any meaningful capacity at that point. I stepped away from the worship team in 2024 and resigned as youth pastor in spring 2025 after being told I would be used more in a teaching role. That did not happen.

    This isn’t a gripe post. It’s an effort to clear the air for those who still follow along.

    From 2012 through 2021, I was in continuous schooling—earning an AA, BA, and MA from Ohio Christian University, followed by an MA(TS) from Nazarene Theological Seminary. I completed the Church of the Nazarene Course of Study for ordination, along with the required service. I served as youth pastor beginning around 2016–2017, was on the worship team from 2011 through 2024, and built a career in insurance while pursuing a CPCU designation.

    I was ordained in 2022, and for a time things seemed positive. But after we moved out of our shared building, my role became increasingly unclear—until it effectively disappeared. Youth attendance dropped from more than twenty per class to just a handful. A major factor was the lack of consistent support and participation needed to sustain it.

    My resignation as youth pastor was formally accepted in March 2025. I was again told I would have more teaching opportunities—more than once a year. That did not materialize.

    Over time, repeated unfulfilled commitments took their toll. After a while, that wears on anyone. I reached a point where I had had enough and chose to step away entirely. My last Sunday ended early after an interaction with someone in authority that I found deeply unkind. I left that day and have not returned.

    Plans for a send-off fell through. My wife, who served as Compassionate Ministries director, was informed that a board meeting she had scheduled was canceled because “numerous people” had told the pastor she was leaving. The issue was simple: she had told no one that—she had planned to stay. At that point, only I (and our youngest) had decided to leave. My youngest expressed it this way: “They treat me like an employee, not someone who belongs here.”

    Given all of that, we declined any kind of send-off.

    I do have concerns and criticisms, but I’m not convinced this is the right time to fully share them. What I will say is that I did not feel heard, even when I made intentional efforts to communicate. I had a direct conversation with our pastor outlining reasonable requests: to teach at least once per quarter, to serve as primary substitute as previously discussed, to be used in teaching more than once every year or two, and to publish this blog as part of that effort. I had also been told I would write a newsletter.

    None of those things happened. Instead, I was told that taking notes during sermons should be viewed as a significant opportunity.

    At some point I made a decision I never expected: I resigned my credentials.

    This was not a loss of faith. I remain as committed as ever. But in that environment, the credentials felt functionally meaningless. I did not feel respected, valued, or utilized in a way that reflected the investment made.

    For context, I was never under church discipline, nor was I given any indication—despite asking—that I had done something wrong. I was also the only other ordained elder in regular attendance. That reality made the disconnect even harder to understand.

    Am I bitter? A little, yes. I think that’s honest. But more than anything, I have very little tolerance left for inconsistency, lack of communication, favoritism, and broken commitments.

    My faith remains intact. My willingness to engage in environments where those patterns persist does not.

    I plan to return to writing here more regularly, starting tomorrow.

  • Godly Friendships

    I don’t need a pocket full of gravel if I have a few gems.

    I wrote this as encouragement to a former coworker the other day while expressing gratitude for her friendship. Even I’m surprised that I can occasionally be poetic—as this just came from my fingers to my phone while texting.

    If we pause to think about this, we often find ourselves collecting something—anything—including “friends.” I use quotes because we have to realize that not everybody we are seemingly friendly with is actually a friend. Most of us probably think, “Yeah, that’s common sense,” even as we collect them as tokens via Facebook or other social platforms, still referring to them as friends. Probably much less rude than saying, “This guy I know, Joe,” but honestly, not terribly realistic.

    Humans are social creatures, to be sure, though we all need solitude as well—even the most outgoing of extroverts. I tend to be very outgoing, but I find myself becoming increasingly guarded. I’m not a cynic, I don’t think—but I’m finding that I resonate more with stoicism these days.

    Tracy Lawrence recorded a song called “Find Out Who Your Friends Are” (written by Casey Beathard and Ed Hill¹) in which he expresses a truth we all recognize:

    “Everybody wants to slap your back Wants to shake your hand When you’re up on top of that mountain But let one of those rocks give way Then you slide back down Look up and see who’s around then… This ain’t where the road comes to an end This ain’t where the bandwagon stops This is just one of those times when A lot of folks jump off.”

    We’ve all experienced it, and the number-one place it happens is often work. I’ve started to categorize these folks as “work friends.” Maybe this is obvious to everyone else and I’m just learning, but I’m pretty outgoing. I even joked with a friend (ironically, a true friend I met at work) that I’m about to be: “Wife, child, child, orange cat, cat with thumbs, clingy female cat, and to heck with everybody else.”

    Why?

    On November 3, 2025—just a couple of days before my birthday—I was called into an unexpected meeting and informed that my role was eliminated. I was about 90% surprised, given some of the reorganizations that had already been happening, but I had assumed my specialized licenses would protect me.

    I was wrong.

    I was simply told, “You’re done. Here’s HR, severance information, get off our network, goodbye.”

    I get it—corporations, even those that talk about being compassionate and caring, are cold-blooded. I have opinions on all of this, but I will keep them to myself for several reasons, as they are very uncharitable.

    I sat for a few moments to gather my thoughts, told my wife, and then texted a couple of people I thought were on my side. Then I sat on my couch in disbelief. I had believed I was at the company I was going to retire from, in a role I was good at, with solid support. This was not to be, and that’s fine—I won’t lie and say I hold no ill will, as I am puzzled why I was selected. Those who remained simply are not qualified—literally—to do my job.

    Please note: I was almost immediately offered three positions at three different places and was hired very quickly. I chose to stay away from work until December 1 to reset, to make sure I didn’t carry forward any bitterness. The only downside is that my body had become accustomed to, “I’ll get up whenever I darn well please, thank you,” so waking up for my first day at the new company was a bit of a struggle. While I actually took the lowest offer, which was a substantial cut from my previous role, I should end up earning more overall.

    I initially heard from nearly everybody I reached out to. Then reality slapped me in the face—they stopped. Not all, but the ones I thought were my closest allies, including one who claimed I was their best friend.

    I know the usual excuse: “It’s awkward.” I reached out and said, “I’m the same dope I was at 2 this afternoon (the meeting was at 2:15), no reason to be weird.” Several didn’t respond—somewhat surprising.

    Even worse, the majority of these folks claimed to be my biggest supporters… and worse still: “Christians.”

    I’ve long since realized that those who make it a point to talk “Jesus this” and “God that” in a work context are often disingenuous—especially when it’s clear that their faith is performative. The most verbal abuse I ever got from customers often came from emails like ILoveJesus@God.com or PastorJimmy@FirstChurchofKindleCounty.net. I wish I were kidding, but I am not.

    Look, I wasn’t the company pastor, and none of these folks were my congregation. If they’d said, “You suck, hail Cthulu,” it wouldn’t have bothered me. But sadly, performative faith is real. As Craig Groeschel said in The Christian Atheist, people love to talk about how spiritual they are when they find out they’re with clergy, yet give clear indications that they do not truly know Jesus.²

    In my case, it showed in attitude and behavior—only treating me kindly if they needed something, bragging about nightly inebriation, and so on.

    But the worst were the liars—and I’m not talking about spiritual things, but provable lies about others. All the while, they smiled in your face… meaning they were almost certainly bashing you behind your back.

    The “best friend” did this to me, and while I cannot prove it, I’m confident it was a primary reason I was selected for elimination. (Note: I am taking steps to ensure accountability. I have zero interest in returning to the company, but if there isn’t any accountability, who knows who else might be damaged?)

    I won’t go into too many details, other than to say a letter was received and it seems I was accused of being its sender—and I was called “irate” in a meeting when no such thing occurred. The problem is this is the epitome of “he said, she said,” and since no investigation was completed, their word was taken as truth. (Please note: I rarely lose my temper, and when I do, it’s likely because WVU is playing poorly because, you know, reasons.)

    I do have a point to all of this, and it may sound like a pitch for stoicism: when I was injured at the U.S. Air Force Academy, I learned that nobody has your best interests at heart except YOU. This isn’t strictly true—my wife, children, parents, in-laws, and our collective grandparents do—but work folks? Not a chance. And this shouldn’t surprise anyone.

    Want to know who knows this best? Yeah…Christ.

    I am not saying this is identical to my situation, but consider the track of Jesus’ relationships:

    1. Jesus fed thousands with a few loaves and fish . He had thousands wanting to see and hear Him.
    2. That number diminished to hundreds when things got difficult (see the aftermath of the Transfiguration and the hard teachings, e.g., John 6:60–66).
    3. Then there were twelve—His original apostles .
    4. Then three in the Garden of Gethsemane .
    5. And only one—John—at the foot of the cross .

    Top of the mountain? People will want to be with you. But when it gets hard? Not a chance.

    So, while I write this partly for catharsis, I caution you as a man of faith to protect yourself: yes, we serve, love (agape), teach, and reach out. Just don’t pretend that everyone you contact is your friend. And this is biblical—you must be willing to brush the dust off and leave .

    Remember:

    • Proverbs 13:20: “Walk with the wise and become wise, for a companion of fools suffers harm.”
    • 1 Thessalonians 5:11: “Therefore encourage one another and build each other up, just as in fact you are doing.”
    • Galatians 6:9: “And let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up.”

    Choose your companions wisely, guard your heart, and continue to walk in faith. True friends—those grounded in Christ—are gems worth holding onto.


    ¹ “Find Out Who Your Friends Are” – Words and music by Casey Beathard and Ed Hill, © 2006 (Sony/ATV Music Publishing). ² Craig Groeschel, The Christian Atheist: Believing in God but Living as If He Doesn’t Exist (Zondervan, 2010).

  • Marriage: Beyond the Myths

    Marriage is one of the most profound commitments we can make, a covenant rooted in love, sacrifice, and faith. After twenty-six years of marriage, I don’t claim expertise, but I have learned enough—through both joy and hardship—to recognize some of the falsehoods that undermine many marriages today. My hope is that what follows will be both practical and biblical, offering encouragement for those seeking a deeper, stronger union.


    Falsehood 1: Marriage is a 50-50 Proposition

    This idea is so untrue it is almost laughable. If marriage were only 50-50, each spouse would be holding something back, reserving half of themselves for…what? Pride? Independence? Selfishness?

    Consider how Paul describes the husband’s calling:

    Ephesians 5:25–28Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her… In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself.

    That’s not 50-50. That’s 100-100. Marriage is about both spouses giving their all, holding nothing back, because two become one flesh. Anything less is shortchanging the covenant.

    And men—paying the bills, mowing the lawn, and sitting in the recliner doesn’t cut it. If that’s all you want out of marriage, why not just hire a maid? Oh right—children. They don’t “just happen.” And when we fail to invest emotionally and spiritually in our families, we risk becoming what psychologists call “the ghost in the household”—physically present but emotionally absent. That absence wounds children deeply.


    Falsehood 2: “Spare the Rod, Spoil the Child” Means God Approves of Beating Children

    This misquote has done lasting harm. Proverbs does speak of the “rod,” but the Hebrew word shebet has a broader meaning. It was a shepherd’s tool—for correction, yes, but also for guidance and protection. David writes in Psalm 23:4, “Your rod and your staff, they comfort me.” Comfort, not cruelty.

    The New Testament reinforces this. The Greek word paideia (discipline) means training, instruction, and character formation. Discipline is about growth, not retribution.

    Hitting children usually teaches three lessons: anger justifies aggression, power decides what’s right, and rules are about avoiding pain—not about wisdom. Spanking may bring short-term compliance, but it damages trust, fuels aggression, and stunts self-control. Instead, Scripture points to another way:

    Deuteronomy 6:6–7These commandments that I give you today are to be on your hearts. Impress them on your children. Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up.

    This is the model: steady, loving instruction. Children learn far more from consistent guidance than from fear.


    Falsehood 3: “I’m the Man, What I Say Goes”

    This distortion comes from misreading Ephesians 5. Yes, Paul writes, “Wives, submit to your husbands” (v. 22). But in the very same passage, he commands believers to “submit to one another out of reverence for Christ” (v. 21). And husbands are told to lay down their lives for their wives.

    That’s not authoritarian rule—it’s sacrificial leadership. In my own marriage, I finally grasped this truth when I realized: if it matters to my wife, then it matters—because she matters. That’s not weakness; that’s Christlike love.

    What I’ve realized is that most of the things that people end up fighting about–the color of the sheets (my wife will say “I want these but they’re pink…” and I’ll say “what do I care? I don’t pay attention when I’m unconscious.”) or what to watch on TV, etc., are minor and not worth getting upset about.

    The big things? Sure, but I have found that we are typically on the same page, and when we’re not, we talk it through.


    Why Marriages Fail

    Even with divorce rates slowly declining, nearly half of marriages still end. Studies show 73% of divorced couples cite “lack of commitment” as the main reason, and nearly half point to communication breakdown. Those are not “irreconcilable differences”—those are choices, daily choices, to stop listening, to stop caring, to stop giving 100-100.

    The truth is simple: marriages break down when we forget why we married in the first place. They grow strong when we recommit every day, when we decide again and again: if it matters to my spouse, it matters to me. And above all, when we remember the covenant we made before God.


    Conclusion

    Marriage is not about keeping score or holding power. It is about covenant, sacrifice, and love that reflects Christ’s love for the church. The myths of 50-50 compromise, harsh discipline, and domineering authority all distort God’s vision. The real picture is far richer: two people giving all of themselves to one another, raising children with wisdom and love, and walking together in faith.

    My own marriage has not been perfect—no marriage is. But with each passing year, by God’s grace, it has grown stronger, rooted in love, listening, and the daily choice to honor the covenant we made. And that is a truth worth holding onto.

  • The Greek Says…Actually, No It Doesn’t

    To paraphrase Greek scholar Bill Mounce:

    “One of the most dangerous things a teacher or pastor can say is, ‘The Greek says…’”

    Why? Because many who say it don’t actually know what the Greek says—they’re just repeating something they’ve heard. And if they’re wrong, they can seriously distort the meaning of Scripture.

    So, what should we do? If you’re going to use Greek to teach others, either:

    1. Learn it for yourself, or
    2. Speak very carefully and humbly.

    ⚙️ My Background

    I studied introductory Koine Greek at Nazarene Theological Seminary under Professor Derek Davis. I also have occasional text access to Dr. Andy Johnson, a senior professor at NTS. I’ve worked through Bill Mounce’s Biblical Greek course, and I continue to learn and grow.

    I’m no scholar—but I know enough to see how Greek is sometimes misused to suppress others or to prop up a theology that doesn’t hold up when placed against the broader witness of Scripture.

    Let’s look at a few commonly misunderstood examples.


    1. John 1:1 — Is Jesus God or “a god”?

    Greek (with transliteration):

    Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ Λόγος,
    καὶ ὁ Λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν Θεόν,
    καὶ Θεὸς ἦν ὁ Λόγος

    En archē ēn ho Logos, kai ho Logos ēn pros ton Theon, kai Theos ēn ho Logos

    English (ESV):

    “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”

    The issue:

    Some claim that because Theos (Θεὸς) lacks the article “ho” (, “the”) in the final phrase, it should be translated “the Word was a god”—suggesting Jesus is a lesser divine being.

    This is the view, for example, of Jehovah’s Witnesses, who deny the full deity of Christ.

    The response:

    In Greek, when a predicate noun (like God) comes before the verb, it often drops the article to emphasize quality or essence, not indefiniteness. So John is saying:

    “The Word was divine in nature.”

    Context confirms this:

    • John 20:28 – “My Lord and my God!”
    • Colossians 2:9 – “In Him all the fullness of deity dwells bodily.”

    💡 Greek grammar rules matter—and so does context.


    2. Romans 16:7 — Was Junia a Female Apostle?

    Greek:

    Ἀσπάσασθε Ἀνδρόνικον καὶ Ἰουνίαν, τοὺς συγγενεῖς μου καὶ συναιχμαλώτους μου, οἵτινές εἰσιν ἐπίσημοι ἐν τοῖς ἀποστόλοις
    Aspasasthe Andronikon kai Iounian, tous suggeneis mou kai sunaichmalōtous mou, hoitines eisin episēmoi en tois apostolois

    English (ESV):

    “Greet Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen and fellow prisoners. They are well known to the apostles, and they were in Christ before me.”

    The issue:

    Some translations change Iounian (Ἰουνίαν) to Junias (a male name), arguing that a female apostle would be too problematic. However, Junia is a well-attested female name in the Roman world, while Junias is not found in ancient sources.

    The grammar:

    The Greek phrase ἐπίσημοι ἐν τοῖς ἀποστόλοις is best translated:

    “Well known among the apostles,”
    not merely “known to the apostles.”

    Even early church fathers like Chrysostom recognized Junia as a female apostle.

    Why it matters:

    This verse is evidence of female leadership in the early church. Distorting her name or role minimizes the contributions of women and reshapes early Christian history.


    3. 1 Timothy 2:12 — A Ban on All Female Authority?

    Greek:

    διδάσκειν δὲ γυναικὶ οὐκ ἐπιτρέπω, οὐδὲ αὐθεντεῖν ἀνδρός, ἀλλ’ εἶναι ἐν ἡσυχίᾳ
    Didaskein de gynaiki ouk epitrepō, oude authentein andros, all’ einai en hēsuchia

    English (ESV):

    “I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet.”

    The issue:

    This verse is often used to forbid women from teaching or leading men. But the issue is the rare Greek verb αὐθεντεῖν (authentein).

    This word is used only here in the entire New Testament. It does not mean general or healthy authority—that would be ἐξουσία (exousia).

    Instead, authentein likely carried a negative connotation, such as:

    • “to dominate”
    • “to usurp authority”
    • “to act on one’s own authority”

    The context:

    Paul may have been addressing a local issue in Ephesus, where false teaching and goddess worship (Artemis) were major concerns. This is not a universal, timeless ban on female leadership.

    Why it matters:

    If we misread authentein as “any authority,” we can wrongly suppress women’s gifts and ignore clear examples of female leaders in the New Testament.


    4. Galatians 3:28 — Just About Salvation?

    Greek:

    οὐκ ἔνι Ἰουδαῖος οὐδὲ Ἕλλην, οὐκ ἔνι δοῦλος οὐδὲ ἐλεύθερος, οὐκ ἔνι ἄρσεν καὶ θῆλυ· πάντες γὰρ ὑμεῖς εἷς ἐστε ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ
    Ouk eni Ioudaios oude Hellēn, ouk eni doulos oude eleutheros, ouk eni arsen kai thēly; pantes gar hymeis heis este en Christō Iēsou

    English (ESV):

    “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”

    The issue:

    Some argue that Paul is speaking only of salvation status—not about ministry roles or social function. But the phrase ἄρσεν καὶ θῆλυ (male and female) echoes Genesis 1:27, the creation of humans as male and female.

    This suggests Paul is undoing divisions from creation and cultural hierarchy—not just offering a “spiritual” truth.

    Why it matters:

    Limiting this to salvation alone supports traditional hierarchies. But read in context, it affirms equal status, dignity, and calling for all people in Christ—across gender, race, and class lines.


    🧠 Final Thought

    I’ll explore each of these more deeply in future posts. But here’s the main point:

    ⚠️ It’s dangerous to act like an expert on Greek when you aren’t.
    And it’s even more dangerous to teach false doctrine built on half-truths or wishful thinking.

    We all bring assumptions to the Bible. But we must constantly test those assumptions—using sound tools, trusted scholarship, and the whole witness of Scripture.

    Sometimes, “The Greek says…” becomes a weapon. But when used well, it should be a key to understanding, not a tool for control.

  • The Bible Wasn’t Written To You (But It Was Written For You)

    Romans 15:4 – “For whatever was written in former days was written for our instruction, that through endurance and through the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope.”

    There’s a mistake many well-meaning Christians make—especially when they’re new to reading the Bible:

    They treat it like it was written to them—directly, personally, in modern English, with all the nuance of their own culture.

    But here’s the truth:

    The Bible wasn’t written to you.
    It was written for you.

    That’s not just a clever turn of phrase—it’s a critical distinction.


    The Bible Is a Library, Not a Letter

    The Bible isn’t a single book—it’s 66. Written over 1,500+ years, by dozens of authors, in three languages, across multiple genres, and addressed to real people in real historical contexts.

    • Genesis wasn’t written to Americans.
    • Leviticus wasn’t written to your youth group—so stop using it to condemn people.
    • Jeremiah 29:11 wasn’t written to your graduating class.
    • 1 Corinthians wasn’t written to you—it was written to a messy, chaotic first-century church trying to live for Christ in a culture that didn’t understand them.
    • Revelation doesn’t exist to make us the star of the show. It’s apocalyptic literature—symbolism written to comfort persecuted believers, not a codebook for modern politics or conspiracy theories.

    But even though these books weren’t written to you—they were written for you.

    They show how God works, what God values, how humans respond, and how we’re invited to live. But to apply them rightly, you must understand the context.


    Context Isn’t Optional—It’s Obedience

    2 Timothy 2:15 says to rightly divide the word of truth. That means we don’t get to twist Scripture to fit our preferences or reduce it to motivational soundbites. Doing the work isn’t legalism—it’s discipleship.

    A few common examples:

    • Jeremiah 29:11 isn’t a promise that God has “great plans” for your next job interview. It’s a message to exiles in Babylon, assuring them of restoration after 70 years. It’s about long-haul hope, not quick fixes.
    • Philippians 4:13 doesn’t mean you’ll win the big game. Paul wrote it from prison, saying he had learned to be content in every circumstance. It’s not about strength to achieve—it’s about strength to endure. And not minor inconveniences—Paul was in chains, literally in a Roman sewer.
    • Matthew 7:1 says, “Judge not, that you be not judged,” but the passage goes on to teach how to judge rightly. Jesus doesn’t ban discernment—He bans hypocrisy.

    When we ignore context, we don’t just misunderstand the Bible—we risk misrepresenting God.


    Why This Matters

    When we treat the Bible like a self-help book or a grab bag of quotes, we make it smaller than it really is. Worse, when we cherry-pick verses to prove our narrow points, we misuse Scripture to reinforce our image instead of being conformed to His.

    Context always matters.

    But when we ask, “What did this mean to them?” before “What does this mean to me?”, we unlock the power and beauty the Holy Spirit embedded in every passage.

    The Bible has authority—but we must handle it with humility.

    • We are not the center of Scripture—Jesus is.
    • We are not the heroes—we are the rescued.

    So What Do We Do?

    1. Study faithfully. Don’t just read devotionally—read intentionally. Ask who wrote it, to whom, why, and when.
    2. Use tools. A good study Bible, commentary, or Bible dictionary can help you go deeper.
    3. Ask better questions:
      • What does this teach me about God?
      • What does this reveal about human nature?
      • How does this point to Jesus?
    4. Live it. Scripture isn’t for winning arguments—it’s for shaping lives. Your life may be the clearest “translation” some people ever read.

    You are the living testimony. People see Jesus more clearly (or more distorted) through you.


    The Bible wasn’t written to you—but by God’s grace, it was absolutely written for you.

    Handle it well.
    Learn it deeply.
    Live it truthfully.

    And let it shape not just your answers—but your heart.

  • The Genuine Reveals The Counterfeit

    Titus 1:9

    He must hold firm to the trustworthy word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to rebuke those who contradict it.

    1 Timothy 4:13–16

    Until I come, devote yourself to the public reading of Scripture, to exhortation, to teaching. Do not neglect the gift you have, which was given you by prophecy when the council of elders laid their hands on you. Practice these things, immerse yourself in them, so that all may see your progress. Keep a close watch on yourself and on the teaching. Persist in this, for by so doing you will save both yourself and your hearers.

    2 Timothy 4:1–4

    I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead… preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching. For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching… they will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.


    There are times when I like to ask people, “What is the primary job of the Secret Service?” or “Why were they created in the first place?”

    Almost everyone answers: “To protect the president.”

    Yes, they do protect the president and other officials. That’s the job most people recognize—ironically, because it’s supposed to be invisible. But even that duty largely involves coordinating with other agencies: local police, National Guard, etc.

    So what is their original, primary function?

    Protecting the United States’ financial system.
    The Secret Service was founded shortly after the Civil War to combat the rampant counterfeiting that threatened to destabilize the economy.

    Here’s the key insight: to learn how to detect counterfeit money, agents don’t study the fakes—they study the genuine article. Fakes come in endless varieties, but there’s only one authentic. Know it intimately, and the phony versions become obvious.

    The same goes for Scripture.


    We’ve all heard people quote, “God won’t give you more than you can handle.”

    Can you find that verse?

    Take your time—I’ll wait.

    You won’t find it. It’s not there.

    Same with Matthew 7:1. People love to quote, “Don’t judge, or you will be judged,” but they often ignore the rest of the passage. While the command is indeed a caution about judging, Jesus adds a qualifier: You’ll be judged by the same standard you use on others.

    So if you’re hyper-focused on someone else’s sexual sin, maybe keep your own browsing history accountable. If you’re vocal about alcohol, take stock of your own intoxicants—whether that’s prescription meds, food, social media, or even your pride.

    This isn’t about being flippant, and it’s not an argument for moral relativism.
    But it is a reminder: these verses are directed first and foremost at believers.


    Let’s get real: if your way of expressing love to someone is by metaphorically beating them with a Bible-bat, don’t be surprised when they recoil. Many people who are far from Christ already know they’re off-track. Most don’t feel great about it. They don’t need help feeling worse.

    They need to see hope, mercy, and truth—and those only come from someone who has been changed by the Word.


    Before we go around correcting people, shouldn’t we first have a real encounter with Scripture ourselves?

    Being “ready in and out of season” isn’t just a catchy phrase—it’s a calling that takes work.
    Daily study. Daily surrender. Daily transformation.

    The beautiful part? When you immerse yourself in God’s Word, it changes you. You become spiritually saturated—“baptized” in the truest sense of the word (Greek: baptizó means “to submerge, to dip into”). You begin to carry His aroma, and that becomes attractive to others without you forcing it.

    And when error comes—and it will—you’ll be ready. You’ll recognize twisted truth, ear-tickling messages, and shallow clichés because they won’t sound like your Shepherd.


    That’s why I encourage people to ask others to show them chapter and verse when a “scripture” is quoted. You’d be amazed how many so-called “verses” simply don’t exist. What’s even more concerning is how often real Scripture is weaponized—used not to convict or correct in love, but to abuse, exclude, or control.

    If your use of Scripture is about keeping people down—women, LGBTQ individuals, alcoholics, whoever—you’re using it wrong.


    What’s the overarching message of Scripture?

    Love God. Love people.

    Immerse yourself in that truth, and the counterfeits won’t stand a chance.